|
Next: Surface Heat Flux Up: Model Implementation Previous: Horizontal Mixing
Surface and Bottom StressThe surface wind stress was assumed to be uniform over the model domain and was determined from wind measurements at the Boston Buoy (Station BB in Figure 2.2) using the Large and Pond (1981) formulation.
Although the scale of the bay is relatively small compared to most synoptic scale wind features, there is certainly some variability over the bay, caused in part by local effects such as the seabreeze. Some of the discrepancies between model and data, especially during the summer, are undoubtably the result of the idealized wind stress field. Observations were available at 1 hourly intervals from the Boston Buoy (anemometer height 13.6 m) except for the period 8/31/90 -- 10/4/90, when wind data from Logan Airport was used instead. A comparison between Boston Buoy and Logan Airport winds (Figure 2.1-1, Geyer et al, 1992) suggests that the winds are comparable during this time period, although the wind at Boston Buoy is weaker during the summer and stronger during the winter than winds at Logan. The hourly averaged winds were converted to wind stress, then averaged over 4 hourly intervals before input to the model to reduce the size of the input file.
The bottom stress is determined from the quadratic drag law applied
at the point closest to the bed where there is a velocity estimate.
This is the middle of the lowest grid cell. Because the distance
between the
the lowest velocity point and the
bed varies with location, the bottom roughness length
Next: Surface Heat Flux Up: Model Implementation Previous: Horizontal Mixing
|